There are two type terminologies of School-based curriculum development(SBCD) in China which one is political terminology and the other theoretical. The theoretical became stronger and stronger and the political did appear to wane by now. The practice is more awfully neglected by theoretical than by political. Chinese SBCD has been introduced from the western while the native research has been heavy lack. The practice of SBCD having been controlled by the theoretical has been in trouble. Developing conceptual connotation from multidimension which is a suitable tactics for the majority schools in China has been promoted by the reconceptualizing SBCD.
BAO Dao-Hong
. Terminologies’ Changing of School-Based Curriculum Development in China and the Analysis[J]. Journal of Schooling Studies, 2014
, 11(2)
: 73
-79
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2232.2014.02.009
[1]刘力.走向以学校为本位的课程发展模式——香港的课程改革计划及其所带来的困扰[J].外国教育资料,1993(4): 20-25.
[2]洪光磊.“学校本位的课程开发”述评[J].外国教育资料,1996(3): 12-15.
[3]崔允漷,杜萍.校本课程开发：辩护与批判[J].教育发展研究,1999(11): 32-36.
[4]吴刚平.校本课程开发的机遇与挑战[J].教育评论,1999（1）:54-56.
[5]崔允漷.校本课程开发：理论与实践[M].北京:教育科学出版社:2000.
[6]王斌华.校本课程论[M].上海教育出版社，2000（12）：1.
[7]傅建明.校本课程支持策略的探讨——英国伦敦教育当局的经验[J].教育发展研究，2000(4):47-50.
[8]余志文.香港校本课程发展之研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2001:12-13.
[9]赵中建.澳大利亚的校本课程开发——访澳大利亚柯廷大学马什教授[J].全球教育展望,2001（10）:1-2.
[10]徐玉珍.校本课程开发：概念解读 [J].课程?教材?教法，2001(4): 12-17.
[11]徐玉珍.《校本课程开发的理论与案例》[M].北京:人民教育出版社，2003（7）.
[12]邓志伟,有宝华.课程理论的国际对话──“首届课程理论国际研讨会”综述[J].教育发展研究,2000（11）:15-21
[13]钟启泉,等.为了中华民族的复兴，为了每位学生的发展——解读[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001(8):390.
[14]朱慕菊.走进新课程——与课程实施者的对话 [M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2002(4):200.
[15]钟启泉.现代课程论[M].上海:上海教育出版社，1989(4):324-325.
[16]张华.“实践的课程范式”及其应用研究[J].外国教育资料，1998（5）：26-31.
[17]陈桂生.何谓“校本课程”？[J].湖北师范大学学报（教育科学版）,1999（4）：57-59.
[18]吴刚平.校本课程开发[M].成都:四川教育出版社，2002(11).
[19]陈桂生.学校课程的建构[J].杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版），2003(4):84-89.
[20]张嘉育.学校本为课程发展[M].台北:师大书苑，1999(7):4.
[21]Marsh, C., Day, C., Hannay, L.,& McCutcheon, G. Reconceptualising School-Based Curriculum Development[M].London: The Falmer Press,1990: 45.
